Due to recent changes on the internet, I came across new information that led me to a remarkable discovery in the disappearance case of Natalee Holloway. Based on this information, I believe I have identified the specific grave in which the remains of Natalee Holloway may be located. This was the reason I decided to contact the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (Openbaar Ministerie, OM).
Remarkably, my discovery coincided almost exactly with a new development in the Netherlands: on March 16, 2026, Beth Holloway filed a criminal complaint against Joran van der Sloot. As a result, a new investigative team was assembled. This created a timely opportunity to bring my findings directly to the attention of that new Dutch investigative team. On June 3, 2026, I submitted my tip, together with supporting documentation, to this team. I subsequently shared the same material with a limited number of directly involved attorneys and journalists.
Note: To protect the privacy of the individuals involved and to avoid interfering with any ongoing investigation, certain names, locations, and identifying details have been redacted from this dossier.
Tip dossier:
Dear Reader,
My name is Constantia Oomen. I am a writer and independent researcher and have been involved with the Natalee Holloway and Joran van der Sloot case for many years. In addition, I published critically for years about Robbert van den Broeke, who presents himself as a psychic medium and first became controversial in 2005 after a blunder during a television broadcast hosted by Irene Moors. Through those publications, Stan P eventually came into contact with me, after which years of contact followed.
The tip at the center of this matter comes from Stan P, a former acquaintance of Joran van der Sloot. Beginning in 2008, Stan developed a relationship of trust—and later also a financial relationship—with Joran, including after Joran was imprisoned in Peru for the murder of Stephany Flores. Stan sent him money and maintained long-term contact with him, including through an iPhone that Joran used to communicate from prison.
Stan later sent me a recorded Skype conversation in which Joran, with visible discomfort, states that “there is something with St. Anna” and that Stan knows what he is talking about. In addition, Stan told me that he had previously gained access to Joran’s iPhone and, earlier, to his computer. According to Stan, he saw information that specifically referred to St. Anna Cemetery in Aruba, grave number 15, and a damaged corner of the grave. According to Stan, there was also discussion of Natalee Holloway being placed at a later date in an already existing grave, by Joran’s father and an alleged acquaintance of Joran.
For many years, this tip remained too vague to be investigated in a concrete manner. That changed recently when the graves at St. Anna Cemetery became digitally accessible, including photographs. This allowed me to map all graves bearing the number 15. There turned out to be a total of 31. This may explain why the tip remained without a concrete follow-up for so many years: only recently did it become clear to me how many number 15 graves actually exist.
I then examined which of these “number 15” graves could realistically be relevant based on the original timeline of Natalee Holloway’s disappearance in May 2005. Graves that only came into use after June 2005 could logically be excluded. Through this process of elimination, a much smaller group of possible candidates remained (one very strong candidate and three weaker, but not entirely excludable, candidates).
Ultimately, one specific grave emerged that, in my opinion, corresponds most closely to the original description contained in the tip. It concerns the grave of █████████ (name redacted), deceased in █████████ (date and age at death redacted). In my opinion, the other characteristics of the grave also correspond strikingly with the original description.
On Thursday, May 28, 2026, a resident of Aruba showed me current footage of St. Anna Cemetery during a live WhatsApp video call, including the grave in question and its immediate surroundings. I possess documentation of this conversation and footage, which I have included here.
I respectfully request that this information and documentation be submitted for review to the team involved in the recent Dutch criminal complaint filed by Beth Holloway concerning Joran van der Sloot.
Link to the Find a Grave search results on which this analysis is based: █████████ (link redacted)
Direct link to █████████ (name and link redacted)
█████████ .jpeg (name redacted) > see below
Footage from May 28, 2026, recorded by a contact person in Aruba
Two unedited screen recordings of a live WhatsApp video conversation from May 28, 2026, with a resident of Aruba, who showed me St. Anna Cemetery and the grave in question on location. During the first few seconds of the recording, I am briefly visible myself because I had not yet discovered how to move my own image out of view. The absence of audio is caused by the limitations of WhatsApp/iPhone screen recording. The unedited videos are included as supplementary documentation of the current situation on site.
The footage shows that the grave is intact, that open graves are present, and that parts of the cemetery are bordered by low walls, making the cemetery appear relatively accessible even outside the regular entrance gates.
█████████ (paragraph redacted)
Elimination Process:
The original dossier contains the elimination process for all graves relevant to this investigation that contain the number 15. In this public version, that section has been redacted for privacy and investigative reasons.
Saint Anna Cemetery Memorials
31 matching records found for
Plot info: 15×
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ (elimination process redacted)
The elimination process considered whether a grave fits within the timeline of Natalee Holloway’s disappearance in May 2005, the physical characteristics and accessibility of the grave, and whether visible features correspond with the original description contained in the tip, including damage to one corner of the grave.
The full analysis, supporting documentation, and conclusions have not been made public for privacy and investigative reasons.
Further reading: three relevant blog posts (selection):
I would like to emphasize that every missing-person case is equally important. My contact person, who prefers to be referred to as ‘the lady in Aruba’, mentioned, for example, Jose Manuel Vicenzo Tromp (born on January 31, 1977), who has been missing in Aruba since November 27, 2007.
Should this blog contribute to renewed attention for unresolved cases in Aruba, I sincerely hope that his case will not be forgotten either.
For more information about other missing-person cases in Aruba, I would like to refer readers to the following overview page:
Door recente veranderingen op het internet stuitte ik op nieuwe informatie die mij naar een opvallende ontdekking leidde in de vermissingszaak van Natalee Holloway. Op basis van deze informatie meen ik het specifieke graf te hebben geïdentificeerd waarin zich mogelijk de stoffelijke resten van Natalee Holloway bevinden. Dat was voor mij aanleiding om contact op te nemen met het Nederlandse Openbaar Ministerie (OM).
Opmerkelijk genoeg viel mijn ontdekking vrijwel samen met een nieuwe ontwikkeling in Nederland: op 16 maart 2026 deed Beth Holloway aangifte tegen Joran van der Sloot. Naar aanleiding daarvan werd een nieuw onderzoeksteam samengesteld. Hierdoor ontstond een actuele mogelijkheid om mijn bevindingen rechtstreeks onder de aandacht van dat nieuwe Nederlandse onderzoeksteam te brengen. Op 3 juni 2026 heb ik mijn tip, inclusief ondersteunende documentatie, aan dit team verstrekt. Daarna heb ik hetzelfde materiaal gedeeld met een beperkt aantal direct betrokken advocaten en journalisten.
Noot: Om de privacy van betrokken personen te beschermen en lopend onderzoek niet te hinderen, zijn bepaalde namen, locaties en identificerende gegevens in dit dossier nu afgeschermd.
Tipdossier:
Geachte lezer,
Mijn naam is Constantia Oomen. Ik ben schrijver en onafhankelijk onderzoeker en houd mij al jarenlang bezig met de zaak rond Natalee Holloway en Joran van der Sloot. Daarnaast publiceerde ik jarenlang kritisch over Robbert van den Broeke, die zich presenteert als paranormaal medium en al in 2005 in opspraak kwam na een blunder in een televisie-uitzending met Irene Moors. Via die publicaties kwam Stan P uiteindelijk met mij in contact, waarna er jarenlang contact over en weer ontstond.
De tip waar het om draait komt van Stan P, voormalig bekende van Joran van der Sloot. Vanaf 2008 bouwde Stan een vertrouwens- en later ook geldrelatie op met Joran, ook nadat Joran in Peru gevangen kwam te zitten voor de moord op Stephany Flores. Stan stuurde hem geld toe en had langdurig contact met hem, onder andere via een iPhone waarmee Joran vanuit de gevangenis wist te communiceren.
Stan stuurde mij later een opgenomen Skypegesprek toe waarin Joran met zichtbaar ongemak zegt dat “er iets met St. Anna is” en dat Stan weet waar hij het over heeft. Daarnaast verklaarde Stan tegenover mij dat hij destijds toegang had gehad tot Jorans iPhone en eerder ook tot diens computer. Daarbij zou hij informatie hebben gezien waarin specifiek werd verwezen naar St. Anna Cemetery op Aruba, grafnummer 15, en een beschadigd hoekje aan het graf. Volgens Stan werd daarbij ook gesproken over het later bijzetten van Natalee Holloway in een reeds bestaand graf, door Jorans vader en een vermeende bekende van Joran.
Deze tip bleef jarenlang te vaag om concreet onderzocht te kunnen worden. Recent veranderde dat doordat de graven van St. Anna Cemetery digitaal beschikbaar kwamen, inclusief foto’s. Daardoor kon ik alle graven met nummer 15 in kaart brengen. Dat bleken er in totaal 31 te zijn. Mogelijk verklaart dit waarom de tip jarenlang zonder concreet vervolg bleef: pas recent werd mij duidelijk hoeveel nummer 15-graven er daadwerkelijk bestaan.
Vervolgens ben ik gaan kijken welke van deze ‘nummer 15’-graven überhaupt relevant konden zijn op basis van de oorspronkelijke tijdlijn van de verdwijning van Natalee Holloway in mei 2005. Graven die pas ná juni 2005 in gebruik werden genomen konden logischerwijs worden uitgesloten. Door dit proces van eliminatie bleef een veel kleinere groep mogelijke kandidaten over (één zeer goede kandidaat, drie minder sterke, maar niet volledig uit te sluiten kandidaten).
Daaruit kwam uiteindelijk één specifiek graf naar voren dat naar mijn mening het meest overeenkomt met de oorspronkelijke omschrijving van de tip. Het betreft het graf van █████████ (naam afgeschermd), overleden in █████████ (datum en leeftijd van overlijden afgeschermd). Ook de verdere kenmerken van het graf sluiten naar mijn mening opvallend aan op de oorspronkelijke omschrijving.
Op donderdag 28 mei 2026 heeft een inwoner van Aruba mij tijdens een live WhatsApp-videogesprek actuele beelden van St. Anna Cemetery getoond, inclusief het betreffende graf en de directe omgeving. Van dit gesprek en deze beelden beschik ik over documentatie, die ik hierbij toevoeg.
Ik verzoek u vriendelijk deze informatie en documentatie ter beoordeling voor te leggen aan het team dat betrokken is bij de recente Nederlandse aangifte van Beth Holloway inzake Joran van der Sloot.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Constantia Oomen
Bijlagen:
– Audiofragment van Stan P: “Natalee is in graf 15…” (een duidelijk fragment gekozen uit vele audio’s, emails enz.): https://on.soundcloud.com/A8RqdWoOdM5EFJWX8m – Skypegesprek Joran–Stan, waarin Joran “St. Anna” noemt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTW98dgxr98 – Link naar de Find a Grave-zoekresultaten waarop deze analyse is gebaseerd: █████████ (link afgeschermd) – Directe link naar █████████ (naam en link afgeschermd) – █████████ .jpeg (naam afgeschermd) > zie verder – Beeldmateriaal van 28 mei 2026, gemaakt door een contactpersoon op Aruba
Twee onbewerkte screen recordings van een live WhatsApp-videogesprek van 28 mei 2026 met een inwoner van Aruba, die mij St. Anna Cemetery en het betreffende graf ter plaatse heeft getoond. In de eerste seconden van de opname ben ik zelf kort zichtbaar, omdat ik toen nog niet had ontdekt hoe ik mezelf uit beeld kon schuiven. Het ontbreken van geluid wordt veroorzaakt door de beperkingen van WhatsApp/iPhone-screen recording. De onbewerkte video’s worden toegevoegd als aanvullende documentatie van de actuele situatie ter plaatse. Hierop is te zien dat het graf intact is, dat er open graven aanwezig zijn en dat zich rondom delen van de begraafplaats lage muren bevinden, waardoor de begraafplaats ook buiten de reguliere toegangspoorten relatief eenvoudig toegankelijk lijkt.
█████████ (alinea afgeschermd)
Eliminatieproces:
Hieronder bevindt zich in het oorspronkelijke dossier het eliminatieproces van alle voor dit onderzoek relevante graven met het nummer 15 erin. In de openbare versie is dit onderdeel afgeschermd om privacy- en onderzoeksredenen.
Bij het eliminatieproces is gekeken naar de vraag of een graf past binnen de tijdlijn van de verdwijning van Natalee Holloway in mei 2005, naar de fysieke kenmerken en toegankelijkheid van het graf, en naar de vraag of zichtbare kenmerken overeenkomen met de oorspronkelijke omschrijving van de tip, waaronder een beschadiging aan een hoek van het graf.
De volledige analyse, onderliggende documentatie en uitkomsten zijn om privacy- en onderzoeksredenen niet openbaar gemaakt.
Graag wil ik benadrukken dat elke vermissingszaak even belangrijk is. Mijn contactpersoon, die graag wordt aangeduid als ‘de dame op Aruba’, noemde bijvoorbeeld Jose Manuel Vicenzo Tromp (geboren op 31 januari 1977), die sinds 27 november 2007 op Aruba wordt vermist.
Mocht deze blog leiden tot hernieuwde aandacht voor onopgeloste zaken op Aruba, dan hoop ik dat ook zijn zaak niet wordt vergeten.
Voor meer informatie over andere vermissingszaken op Aruba verwijs ik graag naar deze overzichtspagina:
Dor di kambionan resien riba internet, mi a topa informashon nobo ku a hibami na un deskubrimentu notabel den e kaso di desparishon di Natalee Holloway. Basá riba e informashon aki, mi ta kere ku mi a identifiká e graf spesífiko den kua posiblemente e restonan mortual di Natalee Holloway ta hañándose. Esaki a duna mi motibu pa tuma kontakto ku e Ministerio Públiko Hulandes (OM).
Di forma remarkabel, mi deskubrimentu a koincidí kasi eksaktamente ku un desaroyo nobo na Hulanda: dia 16 di mart 2026, Beth Holloway a hasi un denuncia kontra Joran van der Sloot. A konsekuensia di esaki, un ekipo nobo di investigashon a wordu formá. Esaki a krea un oportunidat aktual pa trese mi hallazgonan direktamente na atenshon di e ekipo nobo di investigashon Hulandes. Dia 3 di yüni 2026, mi a entregá mi tip, hunto ku dokumentashon di sosten, na e ekipo ei. Despues mi a kompartí e mesun material ku un kantidat limitá di abogadonan i periodista direktamente envolví.
Nota: Pa protehá e privasidat di personanan envolví i pa evitá di interferí ku kualke investigashon aún den progreso, algun nòmber, lokashon i dato identificativo den e dosier aki a wordu afschermd/redactá.
Tip dossier:
Stimá lesadó,
Mi nòmber ta Constantia Oomen. Mi ta un eskritor i investigador independiente, i durante hopi aña mi ta sigui ku e kaso di Natalee Holloway i Joran van der Sloot. Ademas, durante hopi aña mi a publiká artikulonan krítiko tokante Robbert van den Broeke, ku ta presentá su mes komo un médium paranormal i ku ya na 2005 a bira kontroversial despues di un eror den un programa di televishon ku Irene Moors. Dor di e publikashonnan ei, Stan P finalmente a drenta den kontakto ku mi, despues di kua a sigui hopi aña di kontakto entre nos.
E tip ku ta sentral den e asunto aki ta bini di Stan P, un anterior konosí di Joran van der Sloot. For di 2008, Stan a desaroyá un relashon di konfiansa ku Joran, i mas despues tambe un relashon finansiero, inclusive despues ku Joran a keda detené na Peru pa e asesinato di Stephany Flores. Stan tabata manda dje plaka i a mantene kontakto ku dje pa hopi tempu, entre otro via un iPhone ku Joran tabata usa pa komuniká for di prizòn.
Mas despues, Stan a manda mi un konversashon grabá di Skype den kua Joran, ku visibel malestar, ta bisa ku “tin algu ku St. Anna” i ku Stan sa kiko e ta papia di dje. Ademas, Stan a deklará na mi ku e tabatin akseso na un momento determinado na e iPhone di Joran i anteriormente tambe na su kòmpiuter. Segun Stan, e a mira informashon ku tabata referí spesífikamente na St. Anna Cemetery na Aruba, graf number 15, i un skina dañá di e graf. Segun Stan, tambe tabatin mension di pone Natalee Holloway mas despues den un graf ku ya tabata eksistí, pa medio di tata di Joran i un presunto konosí di Joran.
Durante hopi aña e tip aki a keda demasiá vago pa por wordu investigá di un manera konkreto. Esaki a kambia resientemente ora ku e grafnan di St. Anna Cemetery a bira disponibel digitalmente, inkluyendo potretinan. Dor di esaki mi a por inventarisá tur e grafnan ku number 15. Esakinan a resultá ta un total di 31. Posiblemente esaki ta splika dikon e tip a keda durante hopi aña sin un siguimentu konkreto: solamente resientemente a bira kla pa mi kon hopi graf ku number 15 realmente ta eksistí.
Despues mi a kuminsá investigá kua di e ‘grafnan ku number 15’ por a tabata relevante segun e línia di tempu original di e desparishon di Natalee Holloway na mei 2005. Grafnan ku solamente a drenta na uso despues di yüni 2005 por a wordu ekskluí di forma lóhiko. Dor di e proseso di eliminashon aki, un grupo hopi mas chikí di posibel kandidatonan a keda (un kandidato hopi fuerte i tres kandidatonan ménos fuerte, pero no kompletamente ekskluibel).
Finalmente, un graf spesífiko a sali na dilanti ku, segun mi opinion, ta korespondé mas ku e deskripshon original di e tip. Ta trata di e graf di █████████ (nòmber afschermd), fayesí na █████████ (fecha i edat di fayesimentu afschermd). Segun mi opinion, e otro karakterístikanan di e graf tambe ta korespondé di un manera notabel ku e deskripshon original.
Diahuebs, 28 di mei 2026, un residente di Aruba a mustra mi imágennan aktual di St. Anna Cemetery durante un yamada di video WhatsApp en vivo, inkluyendo e graf en kuestion i su entorno direktamente. Mi tin dokumentashon di e konversashon i e imágennan aki, ku mi ta inkluí aki.
Mi ta pidi boso respetuosamente pa presenta e informashon i dokumentashon aki pa evaluashon na e ekipo involví den e denuncia resiente na Hulanda di Beth Holloway kontra Joran van der Sloot.
Link na e resultadonan di buskeda di Find a Grave riba kua e análisis aki ta basá: █████████ (link afschermd)
Link direktamente na █████████ (nòmber i link afschermd)
█████████ .jpeg (nòmber afschermd) > mira mas abou
Material visual di 28 di mei 2026, hasi pa un persona di kontakto na Aruba
Dos screen recordings sin editashon di un videoyamada di WhatsApp en vivo di 28 di mei 2026 ku un residente di Aruba, ku a mustra mi St. Anna Cemetery i e graf en kuestion na e lugá mes. Durante e promé segundonan di e grabashon, mi mes ta visibel kortiku, pasobra ainda mi no tabata sa kon pa move mi propio imágen for di bista.
E falta di zonido ta kousá pa e limitashonnan di WhatsApp/iPhone screen recording. E videonan sin editashon ta wordu agregá komo dokumentashon adicional di e situashon aktual na e lugá.
Riba e imágennan por mira ku e graf ta intacto, ku tin grafnan habrí presente, i ku partinan di e santana ta rodeá pa murayanan abou, loke ta indiká ku e santana por ta relativamente fásilmente aksesibel tambe pafó di e entradanan regular.
█████████ (parágrafo afschermd)
Proseso di eliminashon:
Aki bou ta e proseso di eliminashon ku ta den e dosier original pa tur e grafnan relevante pa e investigashon aki ku tin e number 15 aden. Den e vershon públiko, e parti aki a wordu afschermd pa motibunan di privasidat i investigashon.
Saint Anna Cemetery Memorials
31 matching records found for
Plot info: 15×
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ (proseso di eliminashon afschermd)
Den e proseso di eliminashon a wordu evaluá si un graf ta enkahá den e línia di tempu di e desparishon di Natalee Holloway na mei 2005, e karakterístikanan físiko i aksesibilidat di e graf, i si karakterístikanan visibel ta korespondé ku e deskripshon original di e tip, inkluyendo un daño na un skina di e graf.
E análisis kompleto, dokumentashon subyacente i resultadonan no a wordu hasi públiko pa motibunan di privasidat i investigashon.
Mi ke enfatisa ku tur kaso di persona desaparecí ta mes importante. Mi persona di kontakto, ku ta preferá pa wordo referí na dje komo ‘e dama na Aruba’, a menshoná, por ehèmpel, Jose Manuel Vicenzo Tromp (nasí riba 31 di yanüari 1977), ku ta desaparecí na Aruba for di 27 di novèmber 2007.
Si e blog aki yuda trese atenshon nobo pa kaso nan no resolví na Aruba, mi ta spera sinceramente ku su kaso tampoco lo wordo lubidá.
Pa mas informashon tokante otro kaso di personanan desaparecí na Aruba, mi ke referí lesadónan na e siguiente página di resumen:
This blog is also published on my Lion Hearts WordPress. If you wonder why this extensive piece also appears there: this is an important part of my life and it really has an impact. Moreover, it has a very direct overlap with Rob Nanninga since he was and is also working on this, if it is true that there is afterlife. Also, I get the impression that Rob is helping me in the “background”, that he is forcing the gentlemen to show their cards.
Robbert
I have been involved in this case for fifteen years now, an incredibly long time. There are a few notable developments.
The first one is that I finally have blocked Robbert van den Broeke from sending emails to me. His official acquittal in the threat case for which he was arrested, allegedly for lack of evidence, in October 20181 was no reason for Van den Broeke to choose a scold and threat-free path, and he just continued with his hate emails.
The harvest of Robbert van den Broeke hate emails since about the last blog on my Parameter WordPress siteThe harvest of Robbert van den Broeke hate emails since about the last blog on my Parameter WordPress siteThe harvest of Robbert van den Broeke hate emails since about the last blog on my Parameter WordPress siteThe harvest of Robbert van den Broeke hate emails since about the last blog on my Parameter WordPress site
…
I know that Rob Nanninga had already given up on the “Genverbrander” case by 2012, now that Robbert had been definitively exposed as a con artist and it had also been demonstrated that Van den Broeke conducted online diatribes for which even the dogs would turn up their nose, but I kept it up much longer. For many years I remained curious about what Mr. Van den Broeke had to say to me and allowed his emails, admittedly only through a filter directly in a separate folder. But for some time already, it has been perfectly clear to almost everyone, except to his most loyal fans, that Robbert is a lost cause and that there’s not much honor left in investing energy in researching his actions. He got stuck and all he has been doing for a long time is endlessly repeating everything he once said and did, including his fraud tricks with fake spirit and “alien” photos, all his “loving” messages to his fans and all his hatred towards me and the skeptics in general.
Nowadays, he’s even going with mainstream conspiracy quacks, for example, about the link between 5G and Corona Virus. He did remove one crucial conspiracy clip about this later-on.2 These conspiracy theories are by no means innocent, as believers broker them in everyday life and, for instance, are no longer willing to get vaccinations because they think the government secretly implants chips or they are deliberately poisoned with mercury. Some people even torch 5G masts. Van den Broeke has been publishing many YouTube clips the last year, addressing all kinds of “spiritual” subjects, even addressing me a couple of times.3 It does seem quite innocuous, this new trend of endless preaching videos. I would prefer them any time over his ghost / alien photos and videos deception. Unfortunately, he still does those too, including auto-mutilations on his forehead that he claims are alien and christ signs. I must say he has built up a quite large motley collection of “spiritual” subjects and hence his interest in all these topics seems genuine. Still, in my opinion, there is not much reason left to invest a lot of time and energy in him.
Robbert van den Broeke videos, as seen on May 19, 2020Robbert van den Broeke videos, as seen on May 19, 2020Robbert van den Broeke videos, as seen on May 19, 2020Robbert van den Broeke videos, as seen on May 19, 2020Robbert van den Broeke videos, as seen on May 19, 2020Robbert van den Broeke videos, as seen on May 19, 2020Robbert van den Broeke videos, as seen on May 19, 2020
…
Robbert sent me a whole bunch of hate clips and emails again, a part is in the Google Drive. There’s one Van den Broeke activity I do want to mention. Still working with Johny Webb, yes, the man from the octopus, Van den Broeke published a “channeling” with Adolf Hitler. However, the accompanying text about it and the clip were posted on Webb’s Facebook and YouTube channel. I tweeted about it and then someone reported Webb to Facebook (it wasn’t me). Shortly after, Webb’s facebook went completely black. The clip is still there, but I uploaded a copy in Google Drive just in case:
Fall 2019, I expressed the idea on Twitter to turn the Robbert van den Broeke blogs into a book and I had indeed already worked on it several times (that has come to a standstill). Obviously, this idea was immediately picked up by Van den Broeke and I got his hate emails about that too. Also Stan emailed about it a few times.
Geneburner, the book
…
I suddenly couldn’t digest Van den Broeke’s emails anymore. After another hateful email from Robbert on December 14, 2019 I decided to block him completely. Every time Robbert e-mails me now, his email is instantly deleted and Gmail sends an automated message that he has been blocked and why. Since then, not one single email from him has popped up ever again and I have no idea if he sent them. I am very happy with this decision!
The automated Gmail reply
Stan, Alan and others
Email Constantia to Martin, May 24, 2020, about the email of Stan Pluijmen, in which Stan states he has 9MConstantia about Stan Pluijmen’s email to Constantia, January 18, 2020 Stan Pluijmen in email to Constantia, January 18, 2020
…
Stan Pluijmen is another matter. Stan never seemed hateful in the emails he signed with his own name. It’s a long story, and I don’t feel like repeating everything here. In short, I did not block Stan. I always hoped he would come around, detach himself from Robbert and would no longer participate in their shared lying and cheating games. But Stan has been bouncing like a yo-yo. Stan increasingly emailed me messages that he had changed and in which he admitted to (some) deception by and with Robbert van den Broeke. According to Stan, there is this part to Robbert that’s really “psychic” though. Anyway, Stan and Robbert are no longer a cheating duo together. At least, I see no signs that they still are. Stan even seemed burdened about the past, because he knows better than anyone how much hatred I received through Robbert and through his own, questionable to say the least, network. He even started offering me financial “compensation” in BTC, but I only wanted official compensation, through a notary. For literally years he kept on pushing me to take his money, through email, this started with him offering me money if I deleted the blogs on Parameter, see previous blogs on my Parameter WordPress.4
Stan seemed quite desperate about the existence of my Parameter blogs, he approached it differently too and tried to lure me into a “deal” that if he/they were able to “channel” the code word I would think up for myself and make that official by entrusting somebody with it, I would remove all my blogs. But I didn’t take the bite.
Stan wants code word: “and promise if the code is correct, remove your twitter and all blogs. Deal? No bluff.”
…
In 2020, for a reason I don’t know, he upped his BTC effort considerably, he said/says it was/is because he likes and loves me, and wants to help me. I did kind of become curious (again) if he was just saying things (again), and posted my BTC wallet address publicly on my Genverbrander10 Twitter account (account name changed to RobConstantia on October 14, 2020).
That wasn’t the first time I did that though, I did that in 2018 too. I discovered bitcoin in 2017 when I was trying to order my allergy medicine Ebas from a foreign country, because it’s not available in the United States and they asked for bitcoin or wire payment. Wire payments are expensive here, so I thought to give bitcoin a shot, and with BTC payment, they offered a standard 10% discount. It was all very new to me, and on one day I even posted my bitcoin wallet address on my Twitter account ConstantiaUSA. I tried to find the specific tweet, but I guess I deleted it. I only recently (April 2020) learned that you can indeed publish your BTC wallet address safely after you properly secure your BTC wallet. Though I did that in reverse order, nothing happened. I guess I hoped some magic pigeon would deposit BTC in my wallet. This all must have been mid 2018.
Starting with bitcoin
…
In my Parameter blog I already mentioned the fact that I on impulse and more or less jokingly asked Stan for 1.5 million in 2018, because only then would I feel compensated for all their nuisance and remove my blogs. The underlying idea was that with such a fortune that I could start living very differently, and that I could actually see this as a serious enough compensation and move on.
Behind The Scenes Of Robbert Van Den Broeke, Part IV (August 2018)
…
I didn’t email Stan about it, in fact, I didn’t email him at all, everything went through Twitter.
Stan Pluijmen, I will remove my blogs abt Robbert & your crew members for €1,5 MILLION. You once offered me €15000. Let me see what you have got. I could use the money and I think I've endured enough of your mails and Robbert's hatemails et cetera to consider this compensation.
— Constantia Oomen’s skeptic and personal account (@Genverbrander10) June 29, 2018
Stan thinks 1.5 M is too much
…
But in 2020, things were different. I suddenly received a bitcoin amount deposited on April 8, 2020. Stan had made a deposit! And the next day, after some tweets from me that I was willing to receive Stan’s compensation as an official gift, two more “donations” came, bigger ones, not a fortune, but significant. Well, in total it was about half a bitcoin. It was worth about euro 3200 at the time Stan deposited it. For connoisseurs: of cryptocurrency, this could be literally nothing or it could be quite something, in the future.
I see it as Stan’s free-will compensation that still is on the symbolic side. His compensation doesn’t come close to the real disturbance I had. My critical attention to this case – I literally spent thousands of hours – was indeed my own free choice and everything I did was public. In my opinion, I always stuck to the facts and kept my criticism fair and decent. But it was no choice of mine to be stalked for so many years: 2012-2019. I received hundreds of hate and death threats from a whole bunch of different mailboxes and names, both known and unknown to me, with photos of beheaded, run over and battered (dead) bodies, scolding videos, I was hacked and even threatened with hitmen.5
I can’t be sure where Stan got his money, in emails he says he got it from tricking online casinos. Stan Pluijmen claims he’s a modern Robin Hood, stealing from the rich and giving it to the poor.
Stan Pluijmen (left), the modern Robin HoodStan about the hacker and the casinos, Robin Hood…Stan about the hacker and the casinos, Robin Hood… (translation Google)“Stan, the modern Robin Hood…stealing from crook casino’s, giving it to the poor”“Stan, the modern Robin Hood…stealing from crook casino’s, giving it to the poor” (translation by Google)“Rather robbing a casino a million than a granny 300 euros, do you get it?”
…
On April 25, 2020, I decided to listen to exactly two years of unopened audios of Stan, a rollercoaster of several hours in the afternoon and evening. Since April 2018, I wasn’t listening anymore, because I got angry with Stan, again, since through yet another unsolicited email, he “offered” to ask “medium” Robbert van den Broeke for my Google drive password. As you can understand, I don’t believe in Van den Broeke’s “medium” password reading skills, I do kind of believe in Stan’s or .?.’s hacking skills, so that pissed me off. I really hadn’t been listening secretly, as Stan suggested in many of these audios, he even stated in his audios he was willing to bet a lot of money (did you say one million, Stan?:)
on the (not existing) “fact” I was still listening, So, now Stan is owing me even more. 😉 Not listening for two years and then all of two years at once, in one day, really turned out to be a golden shot. So instead of getting everything in pieces, I now got everything at once, which gave me a much better overview and the distance created in the time dimension was also very good for me to be able to view everything much more at a distance. The audios were insightful, I listened to about hundred audios and their line was consistent: first I heard one year of the old fashioned Stan woo-woo, but since April 2019, Stan started singing to a different tune. This was ushered in by a series of very curious emails in which Stan seemed to have stepped outside of himself and somewhere in the deep universe, as a miracle of mega interpretation of the secrets of the cosmos, spoke about synchronicity, mythical symbols, God, Satan, extraterrestrials and our shared destiny.
Stan turning point
…
Because I was receiving hatemails of Robbert van den Broeke about Stan and Alan simultaneously in which Robbert was kicking furiously at Stan and Alan, even sending me an audio from Stan in which Stan could be heard crying and completely beside himself, I could tell something was going on. In his audios, Stan’s tune changed and; in the most favorable way interpreted for Stan, you can say that he indeed seemed awakened from a bad dream or spell, he used phrases like: “I embarrassed myself, I let go of Robbert, what have I done? Robbert brought me to things, I am no longer under Robbert’s trance, your blogs may stay online because they are correct, the curse of Robbert…, there is no hacker, I’m sorry, I admit to my mistakes … “. Of course in this case, it’s hard to tell truth from lie, but Stan’s Spring 2019 and beyond audios were indicators that the firm trinity Robbert-Stan-Alan (Stan’s husband) had dissolved. Both Van den Broeke and Stan Pluijmen were suddenly emailing me the(ir) “whole truth”: (click on gallery images, this is how I received it)googletranslationrvdbthetruth
Robbert van den Broeke “Hello Constantia the truth with whatever consequences”Robbert van den Broeke “Hello Constantia the truth with whatever consequences”, translation by GoogleRobbert van den Broeke about the casino scamsRobbert van den Broeke about the casino scams (translation by Google)Robbert van den Broeke email, stating Stan is using fake ids to trick online casinosRobbert van den Broeke email, stating Stan is using fake ids to trick online casinos (translation by Google)Robbert van den Broeke about the casino scamsRobbert van den Broeke about the casino scams (translation by Google)Sent by Robbert van den Broeke, alleged SMS Joran about money laundering
…
When you merge these Robbert van den Broeke mails with the following Stan Pluijmen audio:
10:40: Stan “There is no hacker” (> in Robbert van den Broeke hate and death-threat case) 12:20: Stan: “I admit, I was Micha Romijn”.
in which Stan states that he has not been hacking casinos, like Van den Broeke claims, but that he did trick casinos, I think the following could be a realistic model of what really happened: working theory: Stan discovered some weak spots in online casino mechanism and cashed out a lot of money. With a number of fake IDs or other people’s IDs (people knowing about it and collaborating and who he generously compensated for it), he was able to repeat the casino trick. From the Robbert van den Broeke clan respectively from somebody mailing with a “Micha Romijn” mailbox I had been receiving two complete IDs, one of “Micha Romijn” one of a female family member of Alan Sieradzki, an old lady who has since passed away. This “Micha Romijn” stuff was much more sinister and like reported in my Parameter blogs.
WordPress later-on in 2017 removed the fake Micha Romijn ID pics I uploaded in my Parameter blogs. Somebody had complained and I doubt WordPress sees the difference between a real and a (well-recreated) fake ID. So if someone came with the same ID to complain, they had no reason to act differently than usual.
Somebody had complained with WordPress about the fake Micha Romijn ID pics, WordPress removed them
…
Stan Pluijmen confesses in this audio that (indeed) he was “Micha Romijn”. But I could tell by the emails I received there is another person involved, because I recognize Stan’s language and tone of voice, and there were quite some that were not from his pen.
After many years of experience with this whole group around Robbert van den Broeke, the facts (so no suspicions) are that the men are playing battleship with each other’s mailbox, wanted or unwanted. For example, I got a picture of Stan that, according to Stan, was very ugly and it seemed that someone in the room had seized his phone and sent it secretly. This is just one of many examples and I have also explained and substantiated this in my Parameter blog(s) In this regard, it is actually best to read all my Parameter blogs. Because of the enormous chaos that arose from this and which I think was also erected partly intentionally as a smoke screen on the side of Stan, the men ended up in a kind of large, inextricable tangle of cohesive material.
It seems that the gentlemen are holding each other in a delicate balance of compromising facts, and that they may well be quite afraid that the other person will leak information to me, or whoever wants to expose the truth. The many snitch mails to me could be explained by the tense atmosphere between the men, in the spirit: “If you do or don’t do that, I’m going to leak (mis)information about you, watch me, I am not bluffing.”
The “Micha Romijn” person was a piece of the puzzel that didn’t sit well at all with Stan. International police should investigate the motive of “Micha Romijn”. Because WordPress acted upon the complaint from I have to assume possibly the real Micha Romijn, that the (fake) ID pictures should be removed, it appears Micha Romijn must (have) know(n) that his ID was being abused (i.e., it was sent to me, and was it used for playing in online casinos?). In my opinion, all likely scenarios should be investigated. Two important ones: 1. it should be investigated whether Micha Romijn received money in exchange for the use of his ID or 2. that he is a victim of ID fraud. If latter would be the case, then why wasn’t any of this on the news or emailed to/communicated with me or other journalists in any way with convincing evidence? Because I had made some real public fuss about this MR ID, that it was sent to me, just like that, I had extensively tweeted about it with even the un-blurred images of the several ID photos. Moreover, the ID pictures were published on my WordPress site, for everybody to see.
Rachid is another person involved. I even received an email from Jan Willem Nienhuys, my good friend from Skepsis.nl because Rachid was trying to contact me in vain (?) and he tried his luck with Jan Willem Nienhuys. This Rachid seems to be somebody close to Robbert, Stan and Alan, who has been hitchhiking along on this whole case. Robbert van den Broeke claims in his email that Rachid received a lot of money.
Jan Willem Nienhuys was called by RachidJan Willem Nienhuys was called by Rachid, translation by Google
…
I then received a lot of emails from Rachid too, but call it intuition or experience, I didn’t like communicating with him, it felt pointless and like speaking to a twisted mind. Nothing came out of my communication with him and I discontinued it.
Mails Rachid
…
There is also this thing with Dutch crime reporter John van den Heuvel in Stan’s audio. I conclude from the aforementioned audio that Robbert van den Broeke has been spilling some beans towards John van den Heuvel and said to Van den Heuvel that Stan is hacking casinos. As known, John van Heuvel was visiting Joran van de Sloot in his jail cel in Peru, so there we have it again: the circle Joran, Stan and Robbert.6
The two audio files of Leydi Figueroa Uceda sent to me by Stan Pluijmen fit seamlessly into the picture Stan has or had power over Joran and Leydi, because if someone, especially imprisoned or poor like Joran and Leydi, gets very large sums of money, such as these two from Stan,6 this person/they will be more readily inclined to do “weird things” for their benefactor.
And it all fits with Stan’s strange sense of humor and his obsession with me.
To return to Stan’s “confession clip”: Stan says in this audio he had been set up about this casino story, but that he wasn’t arrested, “Just ask John van den Heuvel, it’s true”, which would confirm that he is innocent of hacking casinos.
Stan had confided through emails earlier on that with Joran van der Sloot too, he had cut ties. Alan had his say in this audio also:
and both seemed scared of Robbert, they seemed to think or acted that Robbert had put some sinister curse on them.
I haven’t talked much about Alan, Stan’s husband. The truth is, I like him, just like Stan, but I don’t like their covering up of fraud and deception (Robbert van den Broeke, Joran van der Sloot, et cetera related). That makes all of this extra incomprehensible, I mean, they spent many years in the make-the-other-crazy-but-often-not-in-a-fun-way game. There were and are some sidelines with Alan, like the time I talked to him through his Twitter account. That didn’t end very well and he even deleted that account. Later, and in line with what Stan often did, he denied, but also confirmed that he had been that person on Twitter. I also received emails from him, but most were obviously from Stan using his email address. I could tell not only from the language used, but in these emails Stan simply wrote about the he-person: Alan. Some of the emails were from Alan and in these emails he always seemed very friendly and truly reaching out to me as an independent person (from Stan), although he seemed outraged a couple of times at some of my responses on Twitter. It can certainly be called a fact that he is an absolute insider in everything, since, as Stan’s husband, he lives with Stan day after day.
Emails Alan SieradzkiTranslation provided by GoogleEmails Alan Sieradzki’s mailbox
…
Stan kept saying, over and over again, that he loves me, even calling me an “universal source of love”.
The “old” Stan, December 25, 2018:
Sending emails from the mailbox of Robbert van den Broeke:
Stan emailing audios from the mailbox of Robbert van den Broeke
My firm impression is that many more people are involved in the Robbert van den Broeke-Stan Pluijmen-Joran van der Sloot and so on (than the already in this and previous blogs mentioned names) case, possibly even well-known names from the Dutch and international conspiracy and para world, and that casino fraud and para-fraud are not the only illegal business. Also consider Stan’s rare stubbornness about Natalee Holloway’s alleged remains in Grave 15 at the St. Anna Churchyard in Aruba. Even Joran briefly mentions that St. Anna in the clip Stan via the mailbox of Robbert van den Broeke dropped in my mailbox: (I provided English captions):
Joran van der Sloot talking to Stan Pluijmen about “St.Anna”
…
In April 2020 I received an invitation from a Dutch radio maker to talk about all this and Stan also received an invitation. Stan doesn’t want to and again only communicated this to me:
Stan says some interesting things in these audios and especially in this audio “15”: that he hates the web of lies he got into, and that he is threatened from all sides, but that it’s okay by him when/if I publish all his audios because he loves honesty. He also says that he had already recorded an entire audio for me, was “too honest” – and wonders if there is such a thing as “too honest” – and that he consequently deleted this audio. He talks (again) about his (former) drink and coke problem, and says the audios between 2018 and now on average were recorded with this addiction slur. He also asks if I don’t want to make fun of him and that he loves me. He goes on to say that he doesn’t think he can buy everything off with money. He doesn’t feel like thrill journalism about Joran van der Sloot, and that he’s not exactly boosting himself for being Joran’s friend ,and that this journalist who invited both him and me to talk about Joran van der Sloot and co must think he’s retarded. And also in this audio you can notice that he wanted to say something, but then “caught” himself, something “too honest” again?, and then his sentence stops.
To me it all seems the tip of the iceberg, and my hunch based on the thousands of emails and media files I received in total, is that this whole case has been a smoldering volcano that will erupt once. My personal hope is that this eruption will be thorough and that the whole cesspool will really open. There will be many “losers”, but also some big winners, and I hope Natalee Holloway’s parents will be among those winners to get the information about their daughter Natalee Holloway, which they have been entitled to for all these years, but never got. It is now (on May 30, 2020) exactly 15 years ago that she disappeared.
Something else to conclude this with: to this day, Stan never got my “secret request” (and no, this request is not about money). I asked something from Stan on Twitter, but it is up to him to see what it is, and because they claim to be clairvoyant, I was amazed that this wasn’t, and still isn’t, the case. And Stan, yes, this secret request still stands.
Stan and my “secret request”Stan and my “secret request”Stan and my “secret request”
[2] His turn to conspiracy theories with regard to the Corona Virus didn’t go unnoticed and was picked up by several media groups. NRCGeenStijl Mentionable is the fact that only a fraction of the YouTube commenters on this GeenStijl clip knows Robbert, some even think it is staged or that Robbert is an actor. It could also be they don’t recognize him, as he has changed very much in appearance. Van den Broeke received more publicity in May, 2020 when he was interviewed by Ybeltje Berckmoes of aspiring Dutch broadcaster “Ongehoord Nederland“, “channeling” Right-Wing leader Pim Fortuyn who was murdered by Volkert van der Graaf on May 6, 2002. Both aspiring broadcaster “Ongehoord Nederland” and Robbert were buried under severe criticism and scorn directly after this was aired.
Appreciate my blogs! If you appreciate my Parameter blogs and want to show your appreciation with a small contribution: you can! In this way you help to maintain independent writing. Go to my personal website to donate (see sidebar).
🌟 With many thanks to Rob Nanninga, Sjaan, Manfred and Luciënne (the latter for what she did in the Robbert van den Broeke & co case in 2016) 🤗
parameter.blog 
You must be logged in to post a comment.