When you wish to use this information, please do so while mentioning at least my name, Constantia Oomen, and the name and preferably the link of the website, Parameter. Thank you! 👍🏻!

…

---

Update October 24, 2023. (via Instagram)

…

The news I was hoping for came in yesterday. Kudos to Roel Wiche from Maastricht, with whom I had extensive contact all this time, who quietly and selflessly promoted Stan’s St. Anna’s tip to the former Joran van der Sloot/Natalee Holloway investigator, the former Limburg chief prosecutor, Karin Janssen, of Aruba. And, in addition, Roel encourages Stan by giving one of his two articles on the subject the title: “How the former Limburg chief prosecutor, private detective, and casino hacker continue to delve into the Natalee Holloway case.” This, while the two well-known Dutch “crime reporters” with Dutch names, who criticized and dismissed the St. Anna theory, sat at the Boulevard tables to continue promoting their own long-proven incorrect theories. And what’s the name of the spokesperson in this case in Aruba? Ann Angela! Just like St. Anna and Natalee Ann Holloway. Furthermore, one of my own guardian angels is named Angela… Names from days of old, they are back!

Hoe Limburgse oud-hoofdofficier, privédetective en casinohacker zich blijven vastbijten in de zaak-Natalee Holloway
Limburgse oud-hoofdofficier en detective starten eigen onderzoek in zaak Natalee Holloway: ‘Bekentenis Joran ongeloofwaardig’

---

Update October 19, 2023. (via Instagram)

…

The FBI saw no more options. Stan should have talked to the FBI man. I don’t think I told you this, but he failed to do so. He didn’t want to! The FBI man had urgently emailed me: “This may be our last chance.” He offered to meet Stan in The Hague! They needed his signature, in person! I did everything I could to convince Stan. But Stan didn’t follow through after saying A. So the consequences are what happened yesterday: Joran doing his typical thing again. And in any case, all Dutch people rightly sense trouble. Beth Holloway was sent off by the entire team with a makeup, as they couldn’t think of anything else. So, Stan’s actions in this regard were, in my opinion, the deciding factor. And whether now! I highly doubt it can still work out. After all, they are closing the case, and that is very final.

Hoe Limburgse oud-hoofdofficier, privédetective en casinohacker zich blijven vastbijten in de zaak-Natalee HollowayLimburgse oud-hoofdofficier en detective starten eigen onderzoek in zaak Natalee Holloway: ‘Bekentenis Joran ongeloofwaardig’

---

Recently, I published two audio files on my YouTube channel and here as a blog, which I received from Stan Pluijmen on August 30, 2023. These audio files contain the phone conversation between Joran van der Sloot and Robbert van den Broeke on August 5, 2023. Stan is currently revealing all relevant information regarding Joran van der Sloot, Natalee Holloway, and related matters because he is fed up with the inaccurate reporting about him and Joran. I received more than just that, and it will also be included in this blog. Today, Stan sent me yet another astonishing material.

In the YouTube clip, you can hear Joran making a phone call to Robbert van den Broeke. The conversation is briefly interrupted because Joran’s prison phone credit turned out to be depleted, and he had to replenish it through the “Canteen”. We hear a Joran who seems to be a better person and claims to be one, but we also hear the announcement: “Calls are subject to monitoring and recording,” which is something Joran, as an experienced prison inmate, has long been aware of.

In summary, we now hear that Joran has converted to Jesus for about seven or eight years, and he finds this very comforting. This time, he even calls Robbert “Sweetheart” (at 2:55 minutes), and at 8:52 minutes, he actually says to Robbert, “God bless you, son.” He mentions that he is going to make a documentary with John van den Heuvel and claims that he will truly tell everything with integrity, including details about Natalee. He hopes for a life as a free and honest man, being released around his fifties. However, he doesn’t believe he can omit the part involving Stan Pluijmen from his story. Specifically, the part where he received money from Stan through the casinos Stan was tricking online (see previous blogs). A keen listener might detect a possibly strained and concealed element of extortion in this, and indeed, it appears to be the case, which I will address shortly.

Joran says, “I would have preferred to receive love from him [Stan Pluijmen], then maybe I could have just given him a place in my heart without having to betray him,” at 6:09 minutes into the YouTube clip.

I now invite you to replace the word “love” with one bitcoin, and then another bitcoin

Indeed, Joran does admit to having extorted Stan and having acted “in a manner that is not okay” on 20 occasions. However, he states, in this conversation monitored by the prison management, that he is no longer inclined to extort Stan.

But is that really the case? Look at what Stan sent me today: these screenshots came via Robbert van den Broeke to Stan Pluijmen, and then today to me: A certain Shannon Marie, according to Stan, a friend of Joran, tells Stan through Robbert:

Stan indicated to me that he doesn’t know what is meant by the “Juliaca deal”.

What Joran still doesn’t know is that, for the past couple of years, Stan has already come clean, thanks to my Stan Pluijmen – Parameter blog. He did this for one specific reason: he didn’t want Joran to ever try blackmailing him for money again.

In the meantime, as a quick note: I also shared all of this information with Harold from the Alabama FBI, with Stan’s consent. I’m deviating slightly from my usual blog style. Everything is really coming together now. So, I was writing this, and what comes in? An email from Harold of the FBI, suddenly signing with a different name, which I won’t reveal. When I responded somewhat confused, “Who is writing here?” he immediately emailed back: “Sorry, that’s my nickname, that’s what friends call me.” But Harold suddenly seized on, yes, exactly these two screenshots that I was blogging about in the same minute. For the first time, the FBI man showed emotions. I’m keeping the confidentiality of the mail secret, but the FBI now seems completely convinced, with no more cautious waiting. All of Stan’s information appears to be relevant and highly to the point. They want to talk to Stan. Very much so, talk to him directly, preferably even in person. Only then can the information be used as strong evidence. And no, they’re not concerned at all about anything that bothers Stan in Dutch tax matters. They want justice once and for all for Natalee Holloway, Beth Holloway, and the entire Holloway family. Through me, Stan was requested to meet with Harold, virtually or in person. I’m keeping all the details about this confidential once again. Stan was understandably shocked, the truly reserved Stan, but he messaged me fairly quickly afterward: “I’ll email him tomorrow”. And believe me, this is already a huge milestone for Stan.

Harold first emailed me on July 21, 2023. Afterward, we had a phone call that lasted for an hour and five minutes, and since then, the number of emails from both me to him and him to me has been steadily increasing. Stan was aware of all of this. Returning to all the information that Stan was willing to share with me and the FBI, Stan sent me audio recordings, as he usually does. When I made it clear to him that Harold had requested if he could please email him, I immediately sensed that this was the information the FBI would likely want to have. I asked Stan for permission to forward the audio recordings in their entirety, and Stan agreed.

11 relevant audio recordings sent to the FBI. LITERAL TRANSCRIPT

1 “Do you know, Constantia, what I just don’t like is that this theory, well, it’s not even a theory, I’m sure of it, I was on that phone, I know she’s there, as he himself says, there are several number 15s, but yeah, if it’s just dismissed as nonsense, I actually don’t feel like fighting for it anymore. They won’t go look there, and that’s exactly the psychology behind why they put her there in that grave. Criminals know that no one looks there, so they think she was dumped in the sea, but that’s too obvious. Aruba is heavily monitored, she’s not in the sea. But well, it’s just a bit unfortunate that it’s not taken seriously at all. Joran didn’t say that because I gave him money; he extorted me. I obtained this through a hack, but well.” 

2. “You know I can hack; I’ve also taken things from you. I’m not proud of it, but you know I can do it, and that’s how I did it with him too. I had a Zero-Day exploit that I had self-generalized, I mean, self-generated, sorry. Oh my, I’m tired of it too, that none of it is believed. I’ll be honest with you about that.”

3. “And yes, Kees, Kees supposedly knows better. But he’s just trying to save his own skin because, what if Peter R. De Vries was wrong about Patrick van der Eem, right? As if he would ever admit it if he secretly knew the scenario was different, you know. I also infiltrated Joran’s phone back then, and I saw that he had a rendezvous with Patrick. Patrick van der Eem is also a criminal, and they were sharing the spoils. Joran was addicted to gambling, and it was all staged, the whole conversation in that car. It’s quite a coincidence that he talked in that car, isn’t it, when you think about it? How could Patrick van der Eem have known in advance that Joran would confess everything in that car? What would be Joran’s motive to admit it at all? Yes, it was all just staged.”

Addendum on September 14th at Stan’s request:

…

4. “And, of course, it was also a carefully planned scenario in which Joran was not to blame at all because she suddenly started trembling, she simply fainted. And they dumped her then. That she was hit on the head with a stone, well, that’s all been omitted, and so on, and so on. It all suited them perfectly. It’s just proven that Peter R. De Vries paid Patrick van der Eem more than a hundred thousand, but Joran, well, I saw in that phone, got screwed. He didn’t get his share, yes, he got screwed over big time. Yes, gambling addicts go to great lengths.”

5. “And later, he tried with Greta Van Susteren, he wanted to make money from that. In that regard, Kees is right, but I really didn’t pay him; I hacked him. Yes, that’s how it really happened.”

6. “He had an iPhone, you had one too, and there was a Zero-Day vulnerability in it, and I installed a Trojan horse. By the way, Kees van der Spek knows that it’s possible because he has his hacker Danny on staff. He just knows it’s possible. Well, they can be a bit hypocritical sometimes, I just think.”

7. “When I also hacked Joran, I saw that he had stolen money from his father, and I ultimately got blamed for it. Because he had transferred money to me from his father, as he had a loan from me. But I was on that computer at the time, I hacked him, and I saw that he was embezzling money from a savings account. I immediately reported it to the Police, stating that I wanted nothing to do with it. Yes, I was on his computer at that time too, and it’s all been confirmed. The Police didn’t really mind that I was on his computer because they do admire that hacking skill.”

8. “Yes, Constantia, I just hope I won’t get into trouble because I hacked him; I’m not sure if that’s smart.”

9. “Yes, you know I’m someone, just like you, with a passion for the truth. You can share my audios; I’m transparent, I have nothing to hide. I also want to thank you for that article about the extortion, about the Joran tape being released because I feel better that the whole Ilan Hoekstra issue has been addressed. I’m not a friend of Joran; I was caught up in Joran’s grip. So, in this way, you’ve also cleared my name a bit. Thanks for that. And it’s not even a lie; Joran simply extorted me. The whole money laundering story is nonsense too. I’ve never laundered anything through Joran, or in my entire life, for that matter. The whole story has also been debunked by the police; it’s just a media spectacle, twisted by the press.”

10. “Well, you could also, which might be smart, confirm that you have experience with my hacking skills. That it’s not just a fairy tale. I think I once stole photos from you and mentioned your passwords. [Omitted something here at Stan’s request.] So, you can use that. It strengthens the story that it’s not just a fantasy that I hacked Joran, you know.”

11. “Yes, because you can testify. You can’t prove everything, of course, but it’s nice that the story is being bolstered because now the suggestion is being made, through the podcast, “De vrienden van Joran,” well, sorry, but I’ve never felt like a friend of Joran. But yeah, that’s the narrative around it. Then the suggestion is made that he told everything for the money. No, he extorted me; the truth came out through hacking. That’s a whole different story.”

Indeed, I can testify to that, and that was at the beginning of Parameter as well: “Behind the Scenes of Robbert Van Den Broeke, I.”

Harold also emailed me today the first name of the FBI person who had already interrogated Stan in 2011 regarding Joran van der Sloot and Stephany Flores. But Stan was quickly convinced: even in 2023, coming forward with the truth to the FBI was and is a good idea. I am now going to quote one sentence from Harold today (and have consistently forwarded him links to my blogs and will do so now as well):

“I have been doing this a long time and people almost always regret not coming forward when they had the chance to assist.  Then they must live with that regret.”

And now Stan is going to assist the FBI further in hopefully solving the Natalee Holloway case once and for all. To be continued.