To get straight to the point. I am a bit overwhelmed by this right now. After all those years that I have been devoting my time to the Robbert van den Broeke case. After my last blog I got more serious hate mail from Robbert and audios from Stan. But that has now all become redundant. Something or someone “out there” has sent William Gazecki on my path with the evidence that everyone has been craving for, that last missing piece of the puzzle.
Yes, it indeed is exactly as skeptics including Rob Nanninga, Jan Willem Nienhuys, Pepijn van Erp, Sjaan and I thought.
In my last blog I told about William Gazecki, that he wanted to do a big project with Robbert, with lots of publicity (think of the biggest international things that you can think of, and then I say: yes, that!). Even a lot more than everyone thought, but I leave that open here. It is up to Gazecki if he wants to tell you about this “lots of publicity”.
What happened? Robbert is caught in the act, in moving images. With a fake Maria and a fake UFO “on sticks” in his hand. In the field. Waving in front of the camera.
I immediately give you the images and then the technical details. I want to keep this short. Images say more than words, and you know that I already have dedicated so many words to this.
The videos of the fake Maria and UFO independently of each other:
And this is what Robbert thought he left on Gazecki’s camera:
There is one thing that you really need to know. Exactly in the years that William Gazecki had no contact with Robbert, from 2011 to 2018, the dark Robbert van den Broeke came to life, for the whole world to see. Gazecki had no knowledge of this whatsoever, he was busy with other things in his life. He only knew “the old Robbert”. He is not to suffer any blame, on the contrary: he is the Godsend who got the proof and gave it to me, after he had read what Robbert and co have sent to me.
And here comes the (technical) explanation of William Gazecki:
“I’ve known Robbert a long time, always through Nancy Talbott. There’s a lot I know, and also a lot I *do not* know. I don’t want to hurt him, or see him hurt. However, the truth takes precedence, always. From what I’ve seen, you have been seriously manipulated and abused. Which I *do not* endorse or approve of. Very sick stuff.
I arrived last Wednesday. Had really bad jet-lag, so slept that night. Thursday we spent unpacking a new camera Stan had purchased. Friday was our first night going into the fields. We went out around midnight. Went to the tree that he had taken the “Mary” apparition photos previously (during the day).
He asked for my phone, to take photos… “so no one would suspect any camera tricks” (in his words). I gave it to him, which he wanted set-up to take selfies with flash. I say down next to the tree, and kind of crashed/spaced out. He walked around for a while, taking pics (I wasn’t watching). When he was done, he showed me that he’d captured a lot of images- of Mary (again), and of what we’ve always called a “lightball UFO“.
As we are leaving, he says, “Please send me all the images tonight”, and “I’m not sure whether to share these or not”. I was like, “Ok, sure, no problem”. I had absolutely NO suspicion of anything.
So I get back to my hotel room, and connect the phone (iPhone 6) to my Mac laptop. Immediately, it’s clear there are 2 files per shot- a jpeg still, and an mov (moving image quicktime). There’s an iPhone setting called “Live”, where every snap of the button in photo mode (not video) captures a still imager AND a short image stream (usually 60 frames or so). The LAST frame is what is displayed as your “shot”.
I’m like, “how cool! we can see how the other dimensions do their thing!” So, I start reviewing everything- the still images and the short image streams. Lo and behold, I see Robbert waving these things in front of the camera. I’m like, “oh shit…”. Also, “Live” mode is the default mode starting with the iPhone 6. I didn’t know much about it, and I’m certain Robbert knew NOTHING about it.
The long video is ALL of the short streams strung together, in order. You can see the pattern of waving in front of the lens.”
Of course, when Robbert was confronted with Gazecki’s disconcerting findings, he had his reply ready, just like with the octopus. He would only have wanted to demonstrate how deception would work; that William had asked him to demonstrate that. And even more sick insinuations towards Gazecki that I will not repeat here, because Robbert does not deserve it. William says that this is absolutely not the case, and that he did not know anything about the wave-in- front-of-the-camera-objects that Robbert apparently had in his pocket.
I think I can “predict” who you are going to believe in this matter: William Gazecki or the self-proclaimed medium, the “gene burner”, Robbert van den Broeke. Especially if you have seen the above images. Moreover, the day after William confronted Robbert, Gazecki received through Robbert himself (again) one of Robbert’s infamous photographs, “the demons-scream”. You can always look in my Google Drive to refresh your memory.
William Gazecki: “I don’t want to attack Robbert; I don’t want to hurt him. His life has not been easy, and I don’t want to bring more pain to him. I clearly have enough incontrovertible evidence to fully incriminate him, and it’s not my intention to take unilateral action towards him. The truth will speak for itself, however (and by whomever) it is presented. That said, I will defend and explain myself if or when attacked- be it by Robbert or Stan, or whomever. In that sense I am prepared to state the facts as required.”
Hello Constantia – I am so glad to see that you have investigated Robbert and revealed him for who he truly is. I had dealings with him back in 2010-2013 after he spammed my old blogs and told me that he hopes I get cancer and die (I already had tumours). I tried to tell William the truth but at that stage I think he believed Robbert, just like Nancy does. I knew from the moment I watched his first video that he was a fraud. And I have tried to tell others to stay away from him. Well done on pulling together the evidence on a very tragic, sad and pathetic charlatan. I suspect his boyfriend is equally in on the act. Whatever diffoculties he has had in life, he has no right to manipulate the emotions of other human beings. He is a man driven by an unaware ego.
Bright Garlick. 😉
So it was technology that finally nailed Robbert – but not even a planned techno-trap because neither Robbert nor William knew of the iPhone 6’s default ‘live’ setting!
I’m sure it’s now over for Robbert although I do know that William still believes he has genuine paranormal abilities because of past witnessed events – and he wouldn’t be the first medium to add fakery to his repertoire.
If William hadn’t have crashed out after handing Robbert the new camera, Robbert may not have used his prepared Mary picture and today we wouldn’t have the hoax evidence.
LikeLiked by 1 person